Ortiz

Ortiz v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20204:18-cv-07727California6,973 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUAN ORTIZ, Case No. 18-cv-07727-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER

v. CONFIRMING THAT TRIAL DATE IS

VACATED AND SETTING CASE

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FRANCISCO, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 56, 57, 65 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Juan Ortiz (“Ortiz” or “Plaintiff”) brings this suit against Officers Kevin Conway (“Conway”), Sam Park (“Park”), Michael Vigil (“Vigil”), Bernard Artificio (“Artificio”), and Brenda Sosa (“Sosa”) (collectively, “Individual Defendants”) and the City and County of San Francisco (altogether, “Defendants”), alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) for excessive force, deliberate indifference, and municipal liability, as well as various state law claims. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to various claims, briefing for which is complete. See Dkt. Nos. 56…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.