Ortiz
Ortiz v. City and County of San Francisco
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JUAN ORTIZ, Case No. 18-cv-07727-HSG
8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER
9 v. CONFIRMING THAT TRIAL DATE IS
VACATED AND SETTING CASE
10 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FRANCISCO, et al., 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 56, 57, 65 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff Juan Ortiz (“Ortiz” or “Plaintiff”) brings this suit against Officers Kevin Conway 14 (“Conway”), Sam Park (“Park”), Michael Vigil (“Vigil”), Bernard Artificio (“Artificio”), and 15 Brenda Sosa (“Sosa”) (collectively, “Individual Defendants”) and the City and County of San 16 Francisco (altogether, “Defendants”), alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) for 17 excessive force, deliberate indifference, and municipal liability, as well as various state law 18 claims. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to various 19 claims, briefing for which is complete. See Dkt. Nos. 56…