Zhou

Serenium, Inc. v. Zhou

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20205:20-cv-02132California3,015 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 SERENIUM, INC., Case No. 20-cv-02132-BLF

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

10 v. EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR

ORDER AUTHORIZING ALTERNATE

11 JASON ZHOU, et al., SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS AND

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SERVICE

12 Defendants. [Re: ECF 18] 13 14

15 16 On May 20, 2020, Plaintiff Serenium, Inc. (“Serenium”) filed an ex parte application 17 seeking an order authorizing alternate service on Defendants and extension of time for service. Ex 18 Parte Applic., ECF 18. On May 22, 2020, Defendants made a limited appearance through their 19 counsel, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, to oppose the ex parte application.1 Opp., 20 ECF 20. Serenium filed a reply on May 23, 2020, requesting that a hearing be set. Reply, ECF 21 21. The Court finds that the ex parte application is appropriate for decision without oral 22 argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). 23 The ex parte application is GRANTED…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.