Yates

Yates v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20205:19-cv-06384California4,235 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 MICHAEL J. YATES, Case No. 19-cv-06384-VKD

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

10 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED

11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COMPLAINT 12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 15

13 14 Plaintiff Michael Yates sues the United States for alleged illegal collection activities by the 15 Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and seeks a refund of tax penalties he claims he paid. The 16 government now moves to dismiss Mr. Yates’s amended complaint, the operative pleading, 17 arguing that he has not exhausted his administrative remedies and fails to state a claim for relief. 18 Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the arguments of counsel, the 19 Court grants the motion to dismiss in part and denies it in part.1 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 The present action arises out of the IRS’s assessment of penalties against Mr. Yates for the 22 alleged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.