Stewart

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 JOHN D. KELLER, Case No. 4:20-cv-0232-YGR

5 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

6 v. TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

7 CAMELBAK PRODUCTS, LLC, ET AL., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendants. 8

9 At its core, this case is Bursor & Fisher’s attempt to revive Rachel Lepkowski v. CamelBak 10 Products, LLC et al, 4:19-cv-04598-YGR (N.D. Cal.) (“Lepkowski action”) dismissed by this 11 Court only a few months ago. The changed allegations in the pending amended complaint fare no 12 better than the first. For the reasons set forth more fully below, the Court again concludes that 13 plaintiff John D. Keller lacks Article III standing to pursue the claims in this matter. Accordingly, 14 the Court GRANTS defendants CamelBak Products, LLC’s and CamelBak International, LLC’s 15 (collectively, “CamelBak”) motion to dismiss. 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 Plaintiff John D. Keller bring this action against CamelBak.1 As Lepkowski did, Keller 18 here brings an…