Young
Young v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 TENISHA YOUNG, Case No. 19-cv-03616-RMI
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER
10 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 24 11 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
12 Defendant. 13 14 Plaintiff, Tenisha Young, seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) 15 decision denying her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security 16 income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff’s request for review of the 17 ALJ’s unfavorable decision was denied by the Appeals Council, thus, the ALJ’s decision is the 18 “final decision” of the Commissioner of Social Security which this court may review. See 42 19 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge 20 (dkts. 9 & 11), both parties have moved for summary judgment (dkts. 18 & 24), and both parties 21 seek a remand to the ALJ. While Plaintiff seeks remand for the immediate calculation and 22 payment of benefits, Defendant seeks an order…