Young
Young v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 TENISHA YOUNG, Case No. 19-cv-03616-RMI
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 24 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
12 Defendant. 13 Plaintiff, Tenisha Young, seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) decision denying her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff’s request for review of the ALJ’s unfavorable decision was denied by the Appeals Council, thus, the ALJ’s decision is the “final decision” of the Commissioner of Social Security which this court may review. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge (dkts. 9 & 11), both parties have moved for summary judgment (dkts. 18 & 24), and both parties seek a remand to the ALJ. While Plaintiff seeks remand for the immediate calculation and payment of benefits, Defendant seeks an order…