Optronic Technologies, Inc. v. Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20205:16-cv-06370California4,399 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC, Case No. 16-cv-06370-EJD (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

SANCTIONS

NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO., LTD., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 624 12 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Optronic Technologies, Inc. (“Orion”) seeks sanctions pursuant to Rule 26(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure against defendant Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd. (“Ningbo Sunny”) and its counsel Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP (“Sheppard Mullin”). For the reasons explained below, the Court grants Orion’s motion for sanctions with respect to Ningbo Sunny’s responses to Orion’s document requests but denies the motion with respect to Ningbo Sunny’s responses to Orion’s interrogatory. I. BACKGROUND The conduct for which Orion seeks sanctions concerns Ningbo Sunny’s written responses to Orion’s post-judgment document requests and one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.