Berryhill
Harmon v. Berryhill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 MICHAEL HARMON, Case No. 18-cv-03473-RMI
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUJDGMENT
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 25, 30 Defendant.
13 Plaintiff, Michael Harmon, seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) decision denying his application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff’s request for review of the ALJ’s unfavorable decision was denied by the Appeals Council, thus, the ALJ’s decision is the “final decision” of the Commissioner of Social Security which this court may review. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge (dkts. 4 & 16), both parties have moved for summary judgment (dkts. 25 & 30), and both parties seek a remand to the ALJ. While Plaintiff seeks remand for the immediate calculation and payment of benefits…