Abdullah
Abdullah v. City and County of San Francisco
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 RASHAD ABDULLAH, et al., Case No. 19-cv-05526-LB
12 Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
13 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
14 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Re: ECF No. 43 15 Defendants. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 The plaintiffs, Rashad Abdullah and his daughter T.A., sued the City and County of San 19 Francisco (the “CCSF”) and San Francisco probation officers for civil-rights violations stemming 20 from T.A.’s 11-day detention — for allegedly stealing a cell phone — after a San Francisco judge 21 ordered T.A.’s release (based on a lack of probable cause).1 The court previously granted the 22 defendants’ motion to dismiss the initial complaint’s three claims alleging unconstitutional 23 policies and practices, in violation of Monell v. Dept. of Soc. Serv., 436 U.S. 658 (1978), with 24 leave to amend.2 The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, claiming that the…