Corephotonics, Ltd. v. Apple, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20203:17-cv-06457California1,203 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 COREPHOTONICS, LTD., Case No. 17-CV-06457-LHK

13 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO LIFT

STAY

14 v. Re: Dkt. No. 107 15 APPLE, INC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 On November 6, 2017, Plaintiff Corephotonics, Ltd. (“Corephotonics”) sued Defendant 19 Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) in the instant action for infringement of four patents. ECF No. 1 (“the 2017 20 action” or “the instant action”). 21 On April 30, 2018, Corephotonics sued Apple for infringement of two patents, one of 22 which was included in the earlier suit. Corephotonics, Ltd. v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-2555- 23 LHK, ECF No. 1 (N.D. Cal. April 30, 2018) (“the 2018 action”). 24 On August 14, 2019, Corephotonics sued Apple for infringement of ten patents. 25 Corephotonics, Ltd. v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 19-cv-4809-LHK, ECF No. 1 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 26 2019) (“the 2019 action”). 27 The parties acknowledge that the patents asserted in all three actions are related, and as a 1 result, the Court related…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.