Hamilton

Hamilton v. K-D-W Santa Clara

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20205:19-cv-01066California1,432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JENEEN HAMILTON, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01066-VKD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING AMENDED

v. MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF

MINOR’S COMPROMISE

K-D-W SANTA CLARA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 34 Defendants.

13 In this disability rights action, plaintiffs Jeneen Hamilton and her daughter, Faith Hamilton (a minor), sue for alleged violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53. According to their complaint, Faith Hamilton is a disabled individual, and plaintiffs claim that during a December 2018 visit to a Fish Market restaurant in Santa Clara, California, architectural barriers in the women’s restroom precluded full and equal access to the facilities. Dkt. No. 1. As a result, plaintiffs allege that they had to use the men’s restroom, which caused them embarrassment. Id. ¶¶ 15-16. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.