Hamilton

Hamilton v. K-D-W Santa Clara

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20205:19-cv-01066California1,432 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 JENEEN HAMILTON, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01066-VKD

9 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING AMENDED

10 v. MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF

MINOR’S COMPROMISE

11 K-D-W SANTA CLARA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 34 Defendants. 12

13 14 In this disability rights action, plaintiffs Jeneen Hamilton and her daughter, Faith Hamilton 15 (a minor), sue for alleged violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 16 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), 17 Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53. According to their complaint, Faith Hamilton is a disabled individual, 18 and plaintiffs claim that during a December 2018 visit to a Fish Market restaurant in Santa Clara, 19 California, architectural barriers in the women’s restroom precluded full and equal access to the 20 facilities. Dkt. No. 1. As a result, plaintiffs allege that they had to use the men’s restroom, which 21 caused them embarrassment. Id. ¶¶ 15-16. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.