Blanck
Blanck v. County of Humboldt
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JEFFREY S. BLANCK, Case No. 19-cv-03055-RS (AGT)
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: RFP DISCOVERY
10 v. DISPUTE – RFP NO. 10
11 COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, Re: Dkt. Nos. 49, 54, 55 Defendant. 12
13 The Court previously compelled Humboldt County to further respond to several of Jeffrey 14 Blanck’s initial requests for production. As to another of his initial requests, RFP No. 10, the 15 Court ordered supplemental briefing. In RFP No. 10, Blanck asked the county to produce the 16 following documents:
17 Any Board agenda items in the past ten years that involved the Board of Supervisors going into closed session to hear a complaint of an 18 employee against another employee pursuant to California Government Code section 54957. 19 20 Having considered the supplemental briefing, the Court orders the county to respond to 21 RFP No. 10 by producing all finalized agendas that it prepared over the past ten years for meetings 22 of the county’s board of…