Gould

Gould v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20204:19-cv-00015California9,826 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STEVEN ERIC GOULD, Case No. 19-cv-00015-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING

REQUEST FOR DEFAULT

10 LAURIE MARINO, et al., JUDGMENT; DIRECTIONS TO

PLAINTIFF; REFERRING CASE TO

11 Defendants. PRO SE PRISONER MEDIATION

PROGRAM; ADMINISTRATIVELY

12 CLOSING CASE 13 Re: Dkt. Nos. 12, 23

14 15 Plaintiff filed this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 regarding constitutional 16 violations that occurred at Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”) in Soledad, California, where he 17 was previously housed.1 Now pending before the Court is plaintiff’s request that the Court enter 18 default judgment against defendants ABC Ventures LLC (“ABC”) and Marino. Dkt. No. 12. 19 There has been no response filed to this motion. Also pending before the Court is the summary 20 judgment motion filed by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.