Whitley

Whitley v. Javate

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20205:20-cv-00680California932 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REGINALD WHITLEY,

Case No. 20-00680 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. AMEND; DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT; DENYING

ROSANA JAVATE, et al., MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT

OF COUNSEL

Defendants.

(Docket Nos. 4, 5, 6)

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical personnel at Salinas Valley State Prison (SVSP) where is currently incarcerated. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff has filed a “motion to amend” the complaint in order “to correct all mistakes an[d] errors that I made on my 1983 U.S.C. complaint.” Dkt. No. 6 at 1. Plaintiff has also filed two motions for appointment of counsel. Dkt. Nos. 4, 5. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be addressed in a separate order. 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.