Winchester

Winchester v. Ward

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20204:19-cv-02653California5,072 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 WILBERT WINCHESTER, CASE NO. 19-cv-02653-YGR

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

vs. IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ADAM WARD, ET AL., Re: Dkt. No. 53 Defendants.

Plaintiff Wilbert Winchester brings this action against defendants Oakland Housing Authority (“OHA”) and OHA officers Adam Ward, Muang Saeturn, and David Cach, alleging five causes of action for violations of the Fourth Amendment, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983, based on alleged unlawful detention, failure to intervene, illegal search, false arrest, deliberate fabrication of evidence, malicious prosecution, and Monell liability. Now before the Court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment, which came on for hearing on March 19, 2020. Having carefully considered the papers submitted, the arguments of the parties at the hearing, the admissible evidence, and the pleadings in this action, and for the reasons set forth below, defendants’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.