Winchester

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 WILBERT WINCHESTER, CASE NO. 19-cv-02653-YGR

7 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

8 vs. IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

9 ADAM WARD, ET AL., Re: Dkt. No. 53 10 Defendants.

11 Plaintiff Wilbert Winchester brings this action against defendants Oakland Housing 12 Authority (“OHA”) and OHA officers Adam Ward, Muang Saeturn, and David Cach, alleging five 13 causes of action for violations of the Fourth Amendment, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983, 14 based on alleged unlawful detention, failure to intervene, illegal search, false arrest, deliberate 15 fabrication of evidence, malicious prosecution, and Monell liability. 16 Now before the Court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment, which came on for 17 hearing on March 19, 2020. Having carefully considered the papers submitted, the arguments of 18 the parties at the hearing, the admissible evidence, and the pleadings in this action, and for the 19 reasons set forth below, defendants’…