Baldwin

Baldwin v. Atchley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20205:20-cv-00676California3,565 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

ANTHONY LEE BALDWIN,

11 Case No. 20-00676 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH v. LEAVE TO AMEND; DENYING 13 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL INSTRUCTIONS TO

14 DR. L. GAMBOA, et al., THE CLERK 15 Defendants. 16 (Docket No. 3)

17 18 Plaintiff, a California state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against employees of Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), 20 where is currently incarcerated, and officers at the Del Norte County Sheriff’s Office. Dkt. 21 No. 1. Plaintiff has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Dkt. No. 3. Plaintiff’s 22 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis shall be addressed in a separate order. Dkt. 23 No. 2. 24 25 DISCUSSION 26 A. Standard of Review 27 A federal court must conduct a preliminary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.