Tremper
Tremper v. FCA US LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STEPHEN TREMPER, et al., Case No. 20-cv-00828-HSG
8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO REMAND
9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 21 10 FCA US LLC, 11 Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to remand. See Dkt. No. 21. For the reasons 13 noted below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion to remand the case to Monterey County 14 Superior Court. 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 On January 3, 2020, Stephen Tremper and Heather Tremper (“Plaintiffs”) filed this action 17 against Defendant FCA US LLC in the Monterey County Superior Court. Dkt. No. 1-1. Plaintiffs 18 subsequently filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on January 23, 2020. Id. at 33–51. 19 According to Plaintiffs, California Civil Code § 1795.6(a)(1) requires a vehicle warranty “be extended for the number of days a vehicle is [at] an authorized repair facility for repairs or 20 service.” FAC ¶ 21. Plaintiffs allege that despite this requirement, Defendant “systematically 21 denie[d] warranty coverage for…