Satterwhite
Satterwhite v. United States
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 DACOREY SATTERWHITE, Case No. 20-cv-02116-BLF
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
9 v. DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO
AMEND
10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, [Re: ECF 3] 11 Defendant.
12 13 Plaintiff, DaCorey Satterwhite (“Satterwhite”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint for 14 “professional negligence” in the Santa Clara Superior Court against the United States Postal Service 15 (“USPS”), a federal agency of the United States. Defendant timely removed the case to this Court. 16 Upon removal, the United States was automatically substituted as the party defendant pursuant to 17 28 U.S.C § 2679(d)(2). Before the Court is a motion to dismiss by the United States. ECF 3. The 18 time for Satterwhite to respond to the United States’ motion has passed without any response from 19 Satterwhite. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7–1(b), the motion is suitable for disposition without oral 20 argument, and the hearing set for July 2, 2020…