Floyd
Floyd v. Saratoga Diagnostics, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
LOUIS FLOYD, Case No. 20-CV-01520-LHK
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE
SARATOGA DIAGNOSTICS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Louis Floyd filed this putative class action alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act against Defendants Saratoga Diagnostics, Inc. (“Saratoga”) and its Chief Executive Officer Thomas Pallone. ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for alternative service upon Saratoga and Pallone. ECF No. 15 (“Mot.”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES without prejudice in part Plaintiff’s motion for alternative service. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a resident of California. Compl. ¶ 1. Defendant Saratoga is a California corporation with its principal place of business in Saratoga,…