Floyd
Floyd v. Saratoga Diagnostics, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12 LOUIS FLOYD, Case No. 20-CV-01520-LHK
13 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART WITHOUT
14 v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE
15 SARATOGA DIAGNOSTICS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Louis Floyd filed this putative class action alleging violations of the Telephone 19 Consumer Protection Act against Defendants Saratoga Diagnostics, Inc. (“Saratoga”) and its Chief 20 Executive Officer Thomas Pallone. ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion 21 for alternative service upon Saratoga and Pallone. ECF No. 15 (“Mot.”). For the reasons 22 discussed below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES without prejudice in part Plaintiff’s 23 motion for alternative service. 24 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 25 Plaintiff is a resident of California. Compl. ¶ 1. Defendant Saratoga is a California 26 corporation with its principal place of business in Saratoga,…