Jimenez
Jimenez v. Haxton Masonry, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAVID JIMENEZ, Case No. 18-cv-07109-SVK
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 9 v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
10 HAXTON MASONRY, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 59 11 Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Haxton Masonry, Inc.’s motion for partial summary 13 judgment. Dkt. 59. In light of the current public health restrictions, the Court held a telephonic 14 hearing on May 19, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. Dkt. 67. All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of 15 the undersigned. Dkts. 13, 20. 16 After considering the briefs, arguments at the hearing, and the relevant law, the Court 17 GRANTS Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment for the reasons discussed below. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Plaintiff David Jimenez worked for Defendant as a concrete finisher between 2013 and 20 2017. Dkt. 24 ¶ 14; Dkt. 59 at 7; Dkt. 63 at 1. Plaintiff filed this class action against Defendant 21 alleging federal Fair Labor Standards Act…