Jimenez

Jimenez v. Haxton Masonry, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20205:18-cv-07109California4,159 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID JIMENEZ, Case No. 18-cv-07109-SVK

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

HAXTON MASONRY, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 59 Defendant.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Haxton Masonry, Inc.’s motion for partial summary judgment. Dkt. 59. In light of the current public health restrictions, the Court held a telephonic hearing on May 19, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. Dkt. 67. All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. Dkts. 13, 20. After considering the briefs, arguments at the hearing, and the relevant law, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment for the reasons discussed below. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff David Jimenez worked for Defendant as a concrete finisher between 2013 and 2017. Dkt. 24 ¶ 14; Dkt. 59 at 7; Dkt. 63 at 1. Plaintiff filed this class action against Defendant alleging federal Fair Labor Standards Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.