Torres

Torres v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20204:20-cv-03159California979 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIO TORRES, Case No. 20-cv-03159-PJH Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITH

v. LEAVE TO AMEND SCOTT KERNAN, Re: Dkt. No. 2 Defendant. 11 12 Petitioner, a former California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. His conviction occurred in Contra Costa County, which is in this district, so venue is proper here. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). BACKGROUND Petitioner states that he pled guilty on February 5, 2015, and was resentenced on October 3, 2018, without his knowledge or consent. Petition at 7. He states that during the resentencing, restitution was imposed. Id. According to 2015 the written plea agreement, petitioner initialed that he understood that conviction on the underlying charge would require him to pay restitution. Id. at 20. Petitioner is no longer in custody. Id. at 1. DISCUSSION …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.