Bey

Bey v. Malec

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20203:18-cv-02626California3,098 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RAQ BEY, Case No. 18-cv-02626-SI

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT

JARED MALEC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 117 Defendants.

14 On May 11, 2020 plaintiff Raq Bey filed the instant motion to alter judgment regarding this Court’s April 28, 2020 order. Having considered the papers submitted, pursuant to Local Rule 7- 1(b) and General Order 72-3, the Court hereby VACATES the June 26, 2020 hearing and DENIES plaintiff’s motion. 19 BACKGROUND The Court’s April 28, 2020 order provides the relevant factual background regarding plaintiff’s October 31, 2017 arrest and excessive force claim, the underlying incident of this case. Dkt. No. 115 at 1-5 (Order). The Court decided the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment without oral argument, analyzing six alleged instances of excessive force and finding each instance was reasonable and not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.