Davis
Davis v. Saul
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 ROBERT L. DAVIS, Case No. 19-cv-03714-RMI
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR
10 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
11 ANDREW M. SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 18 12 Defendant.
13 14 Plaintiff, Robert Davis, seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) 15 decision denying his application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social 16 Security Act. Plaintiff’s request for review of the ALJ’s unfavorable decision was denied by the 17 Appeals Council, thus, the ALJ’s decision is the “final decision” of the Commissioner of Social 18 Security which this court may review. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Both parties have 19 consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge (dkts. 8 & 10), both parties have moved for 20 summary judgment (dkts. 16 & 18), and both parties seek a remand to the ALJ. While Plaintiff 21 seeks remand for the immediate calculation and payment of benefits,…