Moulton

Moulton v. Gjerde

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20203:20-cv-02374California1,621 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BRANDY MOULTON, Case No. 20-cv-02374-MMC

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO DISMISS; DISMISSING

9 v. COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO

AMEND; CONTINUING CASE

10 DAN GJERDE, MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 11 Defendant.

12 13 Before the Court is defendant Dan Gjerde's Motion, filed May 8, 2020, "to Dismiss 14 Plaintiff's Complaint." Plaintiff Brandy Moulton has filed opposition, to which defendant 15 has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition 16 to the motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for determination on the parties' 17 respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for June 19, 2020, and 18 rules as follows. 19 In her complaint, plaintiff alleges that, in February 2020, "[s]hortly after" plaintiff 20 "posted her concerns about [defendant's] job performance" (see Compl. ¶ 22), defendant, 21 a county supervisor, "banned"…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.