Bennett
Bennett v. Prop. 47 Public Defenders Deaprtment
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
DAVID BENNETT,
11 Case No. 19-08166 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH v. LEAVE TO AMEND; GRANTING 13 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;
14 PROP. 47 PUBLIC DEFENDER, et al., GRANTING PERMISSION FOR
ELECTRONIC FILING
15 Defendants. 16 (Docket No. 6)
17 18 Plaintiff, a state parolee, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Public Defenders Lara Wallem and Maried O’Keefe of the 20 “Public Defenders for Prop 47 Department,” and the Sixth District Appellate Program 21 (“SDAP”). Dkt No. 1 at 1. Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma 22 pauperis, and a motion for permission for electronic filing. Dkt. Nos. 2, 6. 23 24 DISCUSSION 25 A. Standard of Review 26 A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case…