Arendas

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PETER JOHN ARENDAS, #36554, Case No. 20-cv-01442-CRB (PR)

8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 v. (ECF No. 4)

10 GUTHOLM, et al.,

11 Defendant(s).

12 On April 10, 2020, the court denied plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis 13 (IFP) in connection with this pro se prisoner action for damages for alleged false arrest based on 14 an invalid Washington state warrant because plaintiff: (1) has had three or more prior prisoner 15 actions dismissed by a federal court on the grounds that they are frivolous, malicious or fail to 16 state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and (2) is not seeking relief from a danger of 17 serious physical injury which was imminent at the time of filing. Apr. 10, 2020 Order (ECF No. 18 3) at 1-2 (applying 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)). But under the law of the circuit, the court afforded 19 plaintiff 28 days to show cause why § 1915(g) does not bar IFP status for him or pay the requisite 20 $ 400.00 filing fee. The court…