Gallego
Gallego v. Hunts and Henriques, CLP
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DIANE GALLEGO, Case No. 19-cv-07596-VC
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HUNTS AND HENRIQUES, CLP, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 26 Defendants.
Diane Gallego filed this lawsuit against Hunts & Henriques (H&H) under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) upon receipt of a summons that provided notice for Gallego to appear in Santa Clara Superior Court to respond to a suit purportedly filed by H&H, a law firm, on behalf of Synchrony Bank. See Dkt. No. 1-2. Everyone agrees that the summons was fake. Although Gallego owed a debt to Synchrony Bank, no lawsuit based on that debt was filed in state court, nor is Synchrony Bank (also a named defendant here) a client of H&H. H&H has moved for summary judgment on the ground that Gallego failed to create a triable issue as to whether H&H created or served the sham summons, a necessary fact to hold H&H liable under the FDCPA. See 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(5), (9). To support its motion, H&H submitted a declaration by one of its partners that (i) denied that H&H had sent the summons to Gallego; (ii) explained that many…