Mcintosh

Mcintosh v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20203:20-cv-01649California5,616 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

MYRIAN Y. MCINTOSH,

10 Case No. 20-cv-01649-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO 12 DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., 13 Defendants. 14

15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Plaintiff Myrian McIntosh brings this action against defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 17 U.S. Bank, N.A., and Catamount Properties, LLC, regarding a loan secured by a mortgage on the 18 property located at 102 Ford Drive, American Canyon, CA (“the Property”). McIntosh alleges 19 defendants breached a class action settlement, wherein she was a class member, breached her 20 Deed of Trust, and violated California’s Homeowner Bill of Rights (“HBOR”)—and thus 21 wrongfully foreclosed upon the Property. Defendants now move to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). 22 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), as well as a prior order, see ECF No. 48, the motions are 23 suitable for disposition without oral argument. For the reasons set forth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.