Rattler
Rattler v. MH Sub I, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KIM RATTLER, Case No. 20-cv-02444-EMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO STRIKE OR DISMISS
CLASS ALLEGATIONS
MH SUB I, LLC, et al., Docket No. 7 Defendants.
12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Kim Rattler (“Plaintiff” or “Ms. Rattler”) has filed a putative class action against MH Sub I, LLC1 and Demandforce, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. In particular, she alleges that Defendants provide FCRA disclosure notices that are not “clear and conspicuous,” as required by law. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss or strike a portion of Plaintiff’s class allegations based on FCRA’s statute of limitations. II. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiff alleges as follows. Plaintiff was an employee of “Defendant” in the state of California. See Complaint ¶ 6, 21,…