Cardinal
Cardinal v. Lupo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTOPHER CARDINAL, et al., Case No. 18-cv-00272-JCS
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
JOHN LUPO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 230 Defendants.
12 I. INTRODUCTION This case arose from the sale of a kitchen remodeling business. Plaintiffs Christopher Cardinal and Kitchen Experts of California, Inc. asserted claims for intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract against Defendants John Lupo and Kitchen Fantastic, Inc., among other claims that were not presented to the jury at trial. Lupo asserted a counterclaim for breach of contract. After the Court largely denied Defendants’ motions for summary judgment, see Order Re Mot. for Sanctions & Mots. for Summ. J. (dkt. 134),2 a jury found Lupo liable for damages of $250,000 for intentional misrepresentation, did not reach the alternative claim for negligent misrepresentation, and found in Cardinal’s favor on Cardinal’s …