Beasley

Beasley v. Lucky Stores, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20203:18-cv-07144California2,174 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 MARK BEASLEY, Case No. 18-cv-07144-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LUCKY STORES, INC., et al., Defendants.

10 Before the Court is defendants’ “Motion for Summary Judgment re: Statute of Limitations,” filed March 20, 2020. Plaintiff Mark Beasley (“Beasley”) has filed opposition, to which defendants have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND A. Beasley’s Claims The instant case is a putative class action lawsuit brought by Beasley, a California citizen, as a purchaser and consumer of Coffee-mate, a line of coffee-creamer products. Beasley alleges defendant Nestlé USA, Inc. (“Nestlé”) “manufactures, markets, and sells” Coffee-mate (see Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”), filed October 4, 2019, ¶ 3), that four retailers, namely, defendants Lucky…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.