Beasley
Beasley v. Lucky Stores, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 MARK BEASLEY, Case No. 18-cv-07144-MMC
6 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' 7 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
8 LUCKY STORES, INC., et al., 9 Defendants.
10 11 Before the Court is defendants’ “Motion for Summary Judgment re: Statute of 12 Limitations,” filed March 20, 2020. Plaintiff Mark Beasley (“Beasley”) has filed opposition, 13 to which defendants have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in 14 support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 15 BACKGROUND 16 A. Beasley’s Claims 17 The instant case is a putative class action lawsuit brought by Beasley, a California 18 citizen, as a purchaser and consumer of Coffee-mate, a line of coffee-creamer products. 19 Beasley alleges defendant Nestlé USA, Inc. (“Nestlé”) “manufactures, markets, and sells” 20 Coffee-mate (see Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”), filed October 4, 2019, ¶ 3), that four 21 retailers, namely, defendants Lucky…