Pouladdej

Matilock, Inc. v. Pouladdej

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20204:20-cv-01186California3,803 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MATILOCK, INC., Case No. 20-cv-01186-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

PAYMAN POULADDEJ, Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Payman Pouladdej’s motion to dismiss. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND1 This case involves a dispute between a start-up company and its investor. Plaintiff Matilock, Inc. alleges that Plaintiff is a start-up company “focused on providing solutions for user verification” for businesses such as banking, cryptocurrency, and insurance. See Dkt. No. 12 (“FAC”) at ¶ 11. In January 2017, Defendant met with Plaintiff’s Chief Executive Officer, Filip Victor, and decided to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.