Doe

Doe v. McAleenan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20204:19-cv-03852California6,679 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN DOE, Case No. 19-cv-03852-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CHAD F. WOLF, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 31, 33 Defendants.

Plaintiff John Doe filed this action under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. seeking to reverse the decision by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) denying his application for consent to reapply for admission to the United States. Plaintiff now moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for summary judgment to reverse the February 27, 2019 decision by USCIS’s Administrative Appeals Office (“AAO”) affirming the decision. [Docket No. 31 (Pl.’s Mot.).] Defendants Chad F. Wolf, Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Richard Valeika, and USCIS cross-move for summary judgment to affirm the AAO’s decision. [Docket No. 33 (Defs.’ Mot.).] This matter is appropriate for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.