Doe
Doe v. McAleenan
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOHN DOE, Case No. 19-cv-03852-DMR
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR
9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
10 CHAD F. WOLF, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 31, 33 11 Defendants.
12 Plaintiff John Doe filed this action under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 13 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. seeking to reverse the decision by the United States Citizenship and 14 Immigration Services (“USCIS”) denying his application for consent to reapply for admission to 15 the United States. Plaintiff now moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for 16 summary judgment to reverse the February 27, 2019 decision by USCIS’s Administrative Appeals 17 Office (“AAO”) affirming the decision. [Docket No. 31 (Pl.’s Mot.).] Defendants Chad F. Wolf, 18 Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Richard Valeika, and USCIS 19 cross-move for summary judgment to affirm the AAO’s decision. [Docket No. 33 (Defs.’ Mot.).] 20 This matter is appropriate for…