Alcaraz
Alcaraz v. KMF Oakland LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BERNARDO ALCARAZ, Case No. 18-cv-02801-SI
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 9 v. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION AND DENYING
10 KMF OAKLAND LLC, et al., DEFENDANT ALTEZZA'S MOTION
TO DISMISS
11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 43, 44, 76, 90 12 13 14 Before the Court are plaintiff Bernardo Alcaraz’s motion for preliminary injunction and 15 defendant Altezza Condo LLC’s motion to dismiss the third amended complaint. Dkt. Nos. 76, 90.1 16 The motions came on for telephonic hearing on June 11, 2020. 17 Having considered the papers and arguments and for good cause shown, the Court DENIES 18 defendant’s motion to dismiss and GRANTS plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. 19
20 21 22
23 1 Also still pending on the Court’s docket are two October 2019 motions: plaintiff’s pro se motion for preliminary injunction and defendant Altezza Condo LLC’s motion to dissolve the 24 temporary restraining order (“TRO”). See Dkt. Nos. 43, 44. As the…