Hollis
Hollis v. Risenhoover
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, Case No. 17-00326 BLF (PR) 11 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY v.
JUDGMENT; DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RISENHOOVER, et al., Defendants.
(Docket Nos. 104, 123)
17 Plaintiff, a California state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on care he received while at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”), where he was formerly housed. Dkt. No. 1. Finding the complaint stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, the Court issued an order of service and directed Defendants to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. Dkt. No. 53. Defendants Dr. McCall and J. Afdahl filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that they did not act with deliberate
26 1 The Court granted…