Oakley

Oakley v. DeVos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20204:20-cv-03215California12,221 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 ELOY ORTIZ OAKLEY, ET AL., CASE NO. 20-cv-03215-YGR

7 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; MOTIONS

8 vs. FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS BRIEFS

9 BETSY DEVOS, ET AL., Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 24, 27, 29, 30 10 Defendants.

11 Plaintiffs Chancellor Eloy Ortiz Oakley, the Board of Governors of the California 12 Community Colleges, Foothill-De Anza Community College District, Los Rios Community 13 College District, Los Angeles Community College District, State Center Community College 14 District, and San Diego Community College District bring this action against defendants Betsy 15 DeVos, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of Education, and the United States 16 Department of Education (“DoE”), challenging DoE’s interpretation and implementation certain 17 provisions of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), Pub. L. 18 No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 281 (2020). Plaintiffs’ complaint seeks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.