Shiromi
Shiromi v. City of Berkeley
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GANNA WETTASINGHE SHIROMI, et Case No. 18-cv-03296-VC al.,
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v. Re: Dkt. No. 105
CITY OF BERKELEY,
Defendant.
Ganna Shiromi filed this civil rights action against the City of Berkeley. Her complaint alleges that two Berkeley police officers used excessive force while taking her into protective custody under California Welfare and Institutions Code § 5150. That statute authorizes a 72-hour period of mental health assessment if probable cause exists that “a person, as a result of a mental disorder, is a danger to others, or to himself or herself.” § 5150(a). According to Shiromi’s complaint, the officers’ use of force violated the Fourth Amendment, the Bane Act, and California’s tort law of battery and negligence. The City has moved for summary judgment as to each of these claims, all of which depend on the alleged exercise of excessive force. Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 397 (1989); Cal. Civ. Code § 52.1; Cal. Penal Code § 835a. Although the City has multiple arguments, the only one that need be considered is its contention that the record,…