(PC) Blueford v. Salinas Valley State Prison
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAVAR LESTER BLUEFORD, Case No. 19-cv-00915-PJH
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
9 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
10 KELLY GREEN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 22 Defendants. 11
12 13 This is a civil rights case brought pro se by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 14 1983. His claims arise from his detention at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”) and the 15 denial of kosher meals.1 Defendants Frost and Green have a filed a motion for summary 16 judgment citing administrative exhaustion and qualified immunity. Plaintiff filed an 17 opposition and defendants filed a reply. The court has reviewed all of the filings and for 18 the reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment is granted. 19 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 20 Legal Standard 21 Summary judgment is proper where the pleadings, discovery and affidavits show 22 that there is "no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to 23 judgment as a…