Turner
Turner v. Berryhill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 JACQUELINE RENEE TURNER, Case No. 19-cv-01588-RMI
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR
10 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
11 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 25 12 Defendant.
13 14 Plaintiff, Jacqueline Renee Turner, seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge 15 (“ALJ”) decision denying her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental 16 security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff’s request for review 17 of the ALJ’s unfavorable decision was denied by the Appeals Council, thus, the ALJ’s decision is 18 the “final decision” of the Commissioner of Social Security which this court may review. See 42 19 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge 20 (dkts. 6 & 9), and both parties have moved for summary judgment (dkts. 14 & 25). For the reasons 21 stated below, the court will grant Plaintiff’s motion for…