Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California v. RSC General & Engineering, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10 OPERATING ENGINEERS’ HEALTH
AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR
11 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, et al., No. 3:19-cv-02308-WHA
12 Plaintiffs,
13 v.
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
14 UNITED RSC GENERAL & ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS ENGINEERING, INC., a California 15 Corporation, et al., 16 Defendants.
17 18 INTRODUCTION 19 In this ERISA and Labor Management Retirements Act (“LMRA”) action, 20 plaintiffs move for attorney’s fees and costs. For the reasons below, plaintiffs’ motion is 21 GRANTED. 22 STATEMENT 23 Plaintiffs are (1) Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 of the International Union 24 of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, (2) a related group of funds that constitute employee 25 benefit plans under ERISA, and (3) the Heavy and Highway Committee, a trust 26 established under the LMRA. Their complaint alleges that defendant Richard Ray 27 Spaulding, acting on behalf of defendants RSC General & Engineering, Inc. and Reyre 1 with…