Cruz
Cruz v. Ortiz
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, Case No. 20-cv-00176-HSG
8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
APPOINTMENT FOR COUNSEL;
9 v. DENYING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAPUERIS ON
10 A. ORTIZ, APPEAL; GRANTING REQUEST FOR
COPY OF COMPLAINT
11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 12, 13, 14 12 13 Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. On 14 March 9, 2020, the Court revoked plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 15 § 1915(g) because, prior to the date that he filed this action, plaintiff had at least three cases 16 dismissed as “strikes” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Dkt. No. 6. The Court ordered 17 plaintiff to pay the filing and administrative fees in full if he wished to proceed with the action. 18 Dkt. No. 6. On April 29, 2020, the Court dismissed this action for failure to pay the filing and 19 administrative fees and entered judgment in favor of defendants. …