Alec Otto v. Nano f/k/a Raiblocks f/k/a Hieusys LLC

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 JAMES FABIAN, CASE NO. 4:19-cv-00054-YGR

6 Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION FOR

7 vs. LEAVE TO EFFECT ALTERNATIVE

SERVICE; (2) GRANTING IN PART AND

8 COLIN LEMAHIEU, ET. AL., DENYING IN PART MOTION TO STRIKE

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES RAISED IN THE

9 Defendants. ANSWER; (3) DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS FOR

10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 81, 84, 85 11

12 13 Plaintiff James Fabian brings this putative class action against defendants Nano f/k/a/ 14 RaiBlocks f/k/a Hieusys, LLC (“Nano”), Colin LeMahieu, Mica Busch, Zack Shapiro, and Troy 15 Retzer (collectively, “Nano Defendants”) as well as B.G. Services SRL f/k/a BitGrail SRL f/k/a 16 Webcoin Solutions (“BitGrail”) and Francesco “The Bomber” Firano (collectively “BitGrail 17 Defendants”)1 for securities fraud and related claims in connection with defendants’ promotion of 18 and statements regarding a cryptocurrency or digital asset referred to as NANO f/k/a RaiBlocks 19 (“XRB” or “Nano Tokens”). (Dkt. No. 58…