Alec Otto v. Nano f/k/a Raiblocks f/k/a Hieusys LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 JAMES FABIAN, CASE NO. 4:19-cv-00054-YGR
Plaintiff,
ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION FOR
vs. LEAVE TO EFFECT ALTERNATIVE
SERVICE; (2) GRANTING IN PART AND
COLIN LEMAHIEU, ET. AL., DENYING IN PART MOTION TO STRIKE
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES RAISED IN THE
Defendants. ANSWER; (3) DENYING MOTION TO
DISMISS FOR
10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 81, 84, 85
12 Plaintiff James Fabian brings this putative class action against defendants Nano f/k/a/ RaiBlocks f/k/a Hieusys, LLC (“Nano”), Colin LeMahieu, Mica Busch, Zack Shapiro, and Troy Retzer (collectively, “Nano Defendants”) as well as B.G. Services SRL f/k/a BitGrail SRL f/k/a Webcoin Solutions (“BitGrail”) and Francesco “The Bomber” Firano (collectively “BitGrail Defendants”)1 for securities fraud and related claims in connection with defendants’ promotion of and statements regarding a cryptocurrency or digital asset referred to as NANO f/k/a RaiBlocks (“XRB” or “Nano Tokens”). (Dkt. No. 58…