Tanseer Kazi v. PNC, Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20203:18-cv-04810California7,122 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TANSEER KAZI, et al., Case No. 18-cv-04810-JCS

Plaintiffs,

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO

v. MODIFY CLASS CERTIFICATION

PNC BANK, N.A., Re: Dkt. Nos. 117, 118 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION The Court previously granted in part a motion to certify a class of current or former mortgage loan officers (“MLOs”) represented by Plaintiff Linda Scheid1 asserting claims based on the purported failure of Defendant PNC Bank, N.A. (“PNC”) to compensate rest breaks as required by California law. At the Court’s invitation, each party now moves to modify the certified class: PNC seeks to limit the class to MLOs employed through June 30, 2019 because PNC changed its compensation plan at that time and instituted an arbitration agreement for MLOs hired after that date, and Scheid seeks to expand the claims covered by the class definition to include failure to compensate training sessions in addition to rest breaks. The Court held a hearing 22…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.