Tanseer Kazi v. PNC, Bank, N.A.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TANSEER KAZI, et al., Case No. 18-cv-04810-JCS
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO
9 v. MODIFY CLASS CERTIFICATION
10 PNC BANK, N.A., Re: Dkt. Nos. 117, 118 Defendant. 11
12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 The Court previously granted in part a motion to certify a class of current or former 15 mortgage loan officers (“MLOs”) represented by Plaintiff Linda Scheid1 asserting claims based on 16 the purported failure of Defendant PNC Bank, N.A. (“PNC”) to compensate rest breaks as 17 required by California law. At the Court’s invitation, each party now moves to modify the 18 certified class: PNC seeks to limit the class to MLOs employed through June 30, 2019 because 19 PNC changed its compensation plan at that time and instituted an arbitration agreement for MLOs 20 hired after that date, and Scheid seeks to expand the claims covered by the class definition to 21 include failure to compensate training sessions in addition to rest breaks. The Court held a hearing 22…