Sullivan

Sullivan v. Storer Transit Systems

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20203:20-cv-00143California6,764 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FATIMA SULLIVAN, Case No. 20-cv-00143-JCS

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO

9 v. DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

10 STORER TRANSIT SYSTEMS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendants. 11

12 I. INTRODUCTION 13 Plaintiff Fatima Sullivan brings this action against Defendant Storer Transit Systems 14 (“Storer”) asserting disability discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act 15 (“ADA”) and related claims under California law. On a motion by Storer, the Court previously 16 dismissed Sullivan’s complaint with leave to amend. Sullivan has now filed a first amended 17 complaint, and Storer once again moves to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 18 Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for failure to state a claim under 19 Rule 12(b)(6), and moves to strike portions of Sullivan’s complaint under Rule 12(f). The Court 20 finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.