Herrera

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 SHARLEEN RENEE HERRERA and Case No. 20-CV-00395-LHK

ALBERT HUERTA,

13 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

14 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 15 Re: Dkt. No. 13

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiffs Sharleen Renee Herrera and Albert Huerta (“Plaintiffs”) bring the instant lawsuit 19 against Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”) and Does 1–10 for defects that arose in a 20 2016 Ford Explorer. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Having considered the 21 submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS in part 22 with leave to amend and DENIES in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss.1 23 I. BACKGROUND 24 25 1 Defendant’s motion to dismiss contains a notice of motion that is separately paginated from the 26 memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion. See ECF No. 13. Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) provides that the notice of motion and…