Herrera

Herrera v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20205:20-cv-00395California4,396 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SHARLEEN RENEE HERRERA and Case No. 20-CV-00395-LHK

ALBERT HUERTA,

13 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

14 v. MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

16 Defendant. 17 Plaintiffs Sharleen Renee Herrera and Albert Huerta (“Plaintiffs”) bring the instant lawsuit against Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”) and Does 1–10 for defects that arose in a 2016 Ford Explorer. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS in part with leave to amend and DENIES in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss.1 I. BACKGROUND 24 25 1 Defendant’s motion to dismiss contains a notice of motion that is separately paginated from the memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion. See ECF No. 13. Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) provides that the notice of motion and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.