Brooke

Brooke v. Hyatt Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20203:19-cv-07658California5,990 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 THERESA BROOKE, Case No. 19-cv-07658-TSH

8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TO DISMISS AND DECLARE

9 v. PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS

LITIGANT; PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

10 HYATT CORPORATION, FOR SANCTIONS 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 31

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Theresa Brooke seeks a court order requiring Defendant Hyatt Corporation to 15 bring its lodging rooms into full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 16 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. Pending before the Court is Hyatt’s motion to dismiss Brooke’s 17 Second Amended Complaint and declare her a vexatious litigant. ECF No. 31. At the same time, 18 Brooke moves for sanctions against Hyatt’s counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927. ECF No. 33. 19 The Court finds these matters suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the 20 August 6, 2020 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.