Fabrinet USA, Inc. v. Micatu, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20205:20-cv-00382California3,097 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 FABRINET USA, INC., Case No. 20-cv-00382-VKD

9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 10 v. MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

11 MICATU, INC., ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR MORE

DEFINITE STATEMENT

Defendant. 12 Re: Dkt. No. 18

13 14 Invoking this Court’s diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, plaintiff Fabrinet USA, Inc. 15 (“Fabrinet USA”) filed this action against defendant Micatu, Inc. (“Micatu”) for alleged breach of 16 a manufacturing agreement. Micatu now moves to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”), 17 the operative pleading, or in the alternative for a more definite statement. The matter was deemed 18 suitable for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b); Dkt. No. 25. Upon 19 consideration of the moving and responding papers, the Court denies Micatu’s motion to dismiss 20 and its alternative motion.1 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 According to the FAC, Fabrinet USA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.