In Re Pacific Fertility Center Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20203:18-cv-01586California5,207 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 IN RE: PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER Case No. 18-cv-01586-JSC

LITIGATION

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND

CHART’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE

EXPERT TESTIMONY Re: Dkt. Nos. 302, 350, 411, 413

14 Plaintiffs filed this putative class action against Pacific Fertility Center (“Pacific Fertility”), Prelude Fertility, Inc. (“Prelude”), and Chart Industries (“Chart”) alleging various state law claims and jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act. Plaintiffs thereafter filed a First Amended Complaint which added Pacific Fertility MSO, LLC, (Pacific MSO) a Prelude subsidiary, as a defendant. (Dkt. No. 143.) The Court compelled Pacific Fertility’s claims to arbitration. (Dkt. No. 192.) Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification of their claims for negligence and premises liability as to Prelude and Pacific MSO, and strict liability and negligent failure to recall as to Chart is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.