Lacs
Lacs v. United States of America
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
Jun 25 2020
SUSAN Y. SOONG
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
I NORTHERN DISTRICT OF □□□□□□□□□□
SAN JOSE
2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 AARON LACS, Case No.20-cv-02030-NC
Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
DISMISSAL
13 Re: Dkt. No. 16 5 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. 15
16 7 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that Z 18 no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 19 |! action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 20 |! Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 21 case, provided that such motion is filed within 90 days. All scheduled dates are 22 || VACATED. 23 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 90 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 24 |! Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). 25 …