Salcido

Salcido v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20204:20-cv-01942California300 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 MARTIN SEANZ SALCIDO, Case No. 20-cv-01942-YGR (PR)

5 Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AS

SUCCESSIVE

6 v.

7 R. C. JOHNSON, Warden, Respondent. 8

9 This action was reassigned from a magistrate judge to the undersigned in light of a recent 10 Ninth Circuit decision.1 Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed this pro se petition for writ of habeas 11 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 12 (“IFP”). Dkts. 1, 6. In addition, he has filed a motion to compel discovery, a motion for an 13 evidentiary hearing, and a request for a status report. Dkts. 7, 10, 11. 14 Petitioner has filed a previous petition for a writ of habeas corpus with this Court, 15 challenging the same conviction and sentence. See Case No. C 02-05541-MJJ (PR). The Court 16 denied that petition on the merits. See Dkt. 19 in Case No. C 02-05541-MJJ (PR). 17 DISCUSSION 18 The Court finds the present petition is a second or successive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.