France

France v. Lunceford

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20203:19-cv-03934California1,196 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MICHAEL RAY FRANCE, No. C 19-3934 WHA (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING

v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ROSS LUNCEFORD; CHRIS DEWEY; DAVID EYSTER; CITY OF (Dkt. 24, 26, 28) UKIAH, Defendants. / 15 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a California state prisoner, filed this pro se civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights during his state court criminal proceedings and in police reports. Defendants City of Ukiah and Ross Lunceford, a Ukiah police officer, filed a motion for summary judgment, and defendant David Eyster, the Mendocino County District Attorney, filed a separate motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the motions despite receiving two extensions of time to do so and a warning of the potential consequences if he did not. For the reasons explained below, the motions for summary 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.